In June the Australian Prudential and Regulation Authority (APRA) announced its first relaxation of credit controls imposed on the banks since its imposition of much tighter controls in 2017. These had been imposed to wind back a ramp in lending to property investors, to put a ceiling on interest-only lending, and to force the banks to more thoroughly consider individual borrower’s living expenses.

From APRA’s perspective, this has had the intended effect on the property market. The rampant growth in capital city property prices was controlled, and risks to the financial system implicit in highly geared investors, and even owner-occupiers holding interest-only loans in a property market “bubble”.

But as property market prices declined strongly and then the market stalled APRA has seen the need to once again provide some limited stimulus by allowing banks to reduce their floor lending assessment rates by up to 1.75% per annum.

So what does this mean for borrowers? Is the increased flow of finance likely to be a trickle or a flood?

I have made an analysis for both owner-occupiers and investors across a range of lenders. See Graphs 1 and 2 below.

Borrowing Capacity - Owner Occupiers

Graph 1: Movements in Borrowing Limits - Family Income $100,000

The trends which are apparent are:

  • That borrowing capacities have generally returned to their levels in April 2018

  • Borrowing capacity for both owner-occupiers and investors is only modestly increased (by about 5%) following the latest changes

  • Over the last 3 years, there has been a convergence of borrowing capacities across the major banks

  • The reduction in the mandated minimum lending floor assessment rate is partially offset by an increase in minimum living expense benchmarks used by lenders (known as HEM).

Borrowing Capacity - First Time Investors

Graph 2 - Movements in Borrowing Limits - Investors with Family Income $100,000

Conclusions and Projections

I do not expect the changes allowed by APRA to have a substantial impact on the property market. For most borrowers, their maximum borrowing capacity will see perhaps a 5% increase. At a lending ratio of 80% this would support only a 4% higher purchasing power (and for many borrowers the increase will be smaller).

If interest rates decrease again there will be some further increases in borrowing capacity as lending assessment rates reach the new minimum floor level (at the moment the effect is attenuated by a 2.5% buffer being applied to the borrowing rate). Another rate reduction of 25bps would result in borrowing capacities being increased by up to 3% but then we will have effectively reached the new borrowing floor level.

The other interesting outcome is that as lenders’ calculators merge they are having to look at innovative ways to compete for business. We are seeing a much greater emphasis on rate for risk with many lenders adopting larger discounts for borrowings at 70% LVR or lower. And of course, there are common marketing ploys such as frequent flyer points offers and short term fixed rate specials. In the majority of cases these should be considered as background noise – you’re nearly always better off choosing a lender/loan with lower costs over the longer term.

Social Sharing

Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide general news and information only.  While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information it contains, neither Loanscape nor its employees can be held liable for any inaccuracies, errors or omission.  All information is current as at publication release and the publisher takes no responsibility for any factors that may change thereafter.  Readers are advised to contact their financial adviser, broker or accountant before making any investment decisions and should not rely on this article as a substitute for professional advice.

Spring 2019 Article Logo.png